Consent.organization is unclear

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU2
    • Community-Based Care and Privacy
    • Consent
    • Hide

      Persuasive with Mod - Change definition to "Custodian of the consent" and move to 0..* if no custodian yet assigned.

      Show
      Persuasive with Mod - Change definition to "Custodian of the consent" and move to 0..* if no custodian yet assigned.
    • Kathleen Connor/John Moehrke: 4-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Compatible, substantive
    • DSTU2

      Consent.organization is unclear. The given definition is the organization that manages the consent.

      1. Isn't the location of the resource instance understood by the resource location (Resource.id)?

      2. Is managed an indication of enforcement of the terms of the consent? If so, then this element should be expressed as enforcment, and would need to be 0..*. Where zero indicates that it is not yet agreed to by an enforcing organization, and many might be responsibile for enforcing.

      3. Is managed an indication of the organization which captured the consent onbehalf of a group of organizations. Such as is done with an Health Information Exchange (HIE) that authorizes a set of participants (sometimes all participants) in the exchange to capture consent directive authorizing the whole of the HIE actions under some DURSA.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            John Moehrke
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: