BodySite still does not make sense as a stand-alone resource - 2016-09 core #65

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU2
    • Orders & Observations
    • BodyStructure
    • Hide

      Original Disposition: Dec 01 2016

      Ballot Resolution: Persuasive

      Eric Haas/Jose Costa-Teixera: 7-0-5

      duplicate of 7577

      Recommend changing this to a "common structure" that could be used for Condition.site, etc.

      ---------------------------------------------------------------------

      Feb 09 2017 Proposal to reopen

      Eric Haas, Dan Rutz Against: 0; Abstain: 0; In Favor: 11

      -----------------------------------------------------------------

      redisposition as 'not persuasive' and remove the DSTU#3 note (pre-applied this last bit)

      Show
      Original Disposition: Dec 01 2016 Ballot Resolution: Persuasive Eric Haas/Jose Costa-Teixera: 7-0-5 duplicate of 7577 Recommend changing this to a "common structure" that could be used for Condition.site, etc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Feb 09 2017 Proposal to reopen Eric Haas, Dan Rutz Against: 0; Abstain: 0; In Favor: 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------- redisposition as 'not persuasive' and remove the DSTU#3 note (pre-applied this last bit)
    • Eric Haas/Frieda Hall: 11-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive
    • DSTU2

      Comment:

      Deprecate or remove this resource; it still does not make sense to have this as a stand-alone resource with a mandatory reference to "patient".

      Summary:

      BodySite still does not make sense as a stand-alone resource

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Ioana Singureanu
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: