Reference to 'type' should be ElementDefinition.type? - 2016-09 core #482

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU2
    • Orders & Observations
    • DataElement (see StructureDefinition) [deprecated]
    • 5.9.2
    • Hide

      remove the text.

      "if DataElement.type is present, the instance represents a 11179 data element. If DataElement.type is absent, the instance represents a 11179 data element concept."

      Show
      remove the text. "if DataElement.type is present, the instance represents a 11179 data element. If DataElement.type is absent, the instance represents a 11179 data element concept."
    • Eric Haas/Kathy Walsh: 7-0-2
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive
    • DSTU2

      Existing Wording: if DataElement.type is present, the instance represents a 11179 data element. If DataElement.type is absent, the instance represents a 11179 data element concept.

      Comment:

      I don't see an attribute named 'type' in the resource definition. Is it referring to the containing ElementDefinition type?

      Summary:

      Reference to 'type' should be ElementDefinition.type?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Claude Nanjo (Inactive)
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: