Combine relationAction.relationship and relatedAction.anchor - 2016-09 cqf #61

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU2
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • PlanDefinition
    • 14.2.3
    • Hide

      Agreed, we will collapse the elements, preserving the optionality of the anchor, so the possible values would be:

      before-start\\before\\before-end\\concurrent-with-start\\concurrent\\concurrent-with-end\\after-start\\after
      after-end

      Show
      Agreed, we will collapse the elements, preserving the optionality of the anchor, so the possible values would be: before-start\\before\\before-end\\concurrent-with-start\\concurrent\\concurrent-with-end\\after-start\\after after-end
    • Bryn Rhodes/Howard Strasberg: 6-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Non-compatible
    • DSTU2

      Comment:

      Could relatedAction.relationship and relatedAction.anchor be combined? Representing "before the end" with a relationship of "before" and an anchor of "end" seems less intuitive than having "before the end" as it's own relationship. The same applies to GuidanceResponse.

      Summary:

      Combine relationAction.relationship and relatedAction.anchor

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            jared_nichols
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: