Should two different syntaxes for $evaluate be supported, in the same way as Measure? - 2016-09 cqf #62

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Considered - Question answered
    • Priority: Medium
    • Clinical Quality Information Framework (CQIF) [deprecated] (FHIR)
    • DSTU2
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • DecisionSupportServiceModule [deprecated]
    • 14.4.10.1
    • Hide

      The way evaluation is done within the clinical reasoning module is being modified to use a service definition in combination with an operation definition. A service definition can point to a particular operation definition to achieve any specific syntax, so this could be supported if desired, but the base syntax will remain patient-specific.

      Show
      The way evaluation is done within the clinical reasoning module is being modified to use a service definition in combination with an operation definition. A service definition can point to a particular operation definition to achieve any specific syntax, so this could be supported if desired, but the base syntax will remain patient-specific.
    • Bryn Rhodes/Howard Strasberg: 6-0-0
    • Clarification

      Comment:

      Should two different syntaxes for $evaluate be supported, in the same way as Measure?

      Summary:

      Should two different syntaxes for $evaluate be supported, in the same way as Measure?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            jared_nichols
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: