Better explanation of the example - 2016-09 cqf #126

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • Clinical Quality Information Framework (CQIF) [deprecated] (FHIR)
    • DSTU2
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • Clinical Reasoning Module [deprecated]
    • G.4.1.3
    • Hide

      Agreed, we will add clarifying documentation to the example.

      Show
      Agreed, we will add clarifying documentation to the example.
    • Bryn Rhodes/Brian Alper: 8-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive

      Existing Wording: [Example in this section]

      Comment:

      Suggest adding more comments in-line to explain the example. E.g.: is the ActivityDefinition being defined elsewhere (not shown)? Why are codes used (e.g., for specialty) vs. what appear to be named items (e.g., "Patient") elsewhere? Are those named items defined elsewhere? If so, could they be included in this example? For the representaiton of a code in a String field, is there a specific, normative syntax that is supposed to be used, e.g., for specialty?

      Summary:

      Better explanation of the example

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Kensaku Kawamoto
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: