CCD on FHIR: Required vs optional sections - 2016-09 ccda #54

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • US C-CDA on FHIR (FHIR)
    • DSTU2
    • Structured Documents
    • Composition [deprecated]
    • (profiles) [deprecated]
    • Hide

      Will review the ordering of sections with a preference for putting required sections first, unless there is a compelling reason not to do so for a given document type. (i.e. preference for SHALLs, then SHOULDs, then MAYs from C-CDA)

      Will also review our use of slicing to make sure that the order of the slices does not impact the ordering of instances, because that is not the intent here.

      Show
      Will review the ordering of sections with a preference for putting required sections first, unless there is a compelling reason not to do so for a given document type. (i.e. preference for SHALLs, then SHOULDs, then MAYs from C-CDA) Will also review our use of slicing to make sure that the order of the slices does not impact the ordering of instances, because that is not the intent here.
    • Sarah Gaunt/Lisa Nelson: 9-0-0
    • Correction
    • Compatible, substantive

      Existing Wording: n/a

      Proposed Wording: n/a

      Comment:

      The section order of 0..1 and than 1..1 makes it difficult to quickly see which sections are required. Is it possible to put the 1..1 sections first, or Flag as 'must support'?

      Summary:

      CCD on FHIR: Required vs optional sections

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            chris_hills
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: