Language code issue - 2016-09 ccda #108

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU2
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • BaseResource
    • (profiles)
    • Hide

      this is an extensible binding with a max binding so that you can't use a made up language. This is exactly how vocab say this should be done.

      Show
      this is an extensible binding with a max binding so that you can't use a made up language. This is exactly how vocab say this should be done.
    • Grahame Grieve/Josh Mandel: 7-0-0
    • Correction

      Existing Wording: Composition.language Common Languages binding : extensible Common Languages

      Comment:

      While I can see that some argue that a new language not in the RFC would present a problem but sending a made up language code is not reasonable. This should be required binding

      Summary:

      Language code issue

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Rob McClure
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: