Location.address comment

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Patient Administration
    • Location
    • Hide

      The existing comment will be removed, as is not correct.

      And a new comment be included:

      "Additional addresses should be recorded another instance of the Location resource, or via the Organization"

      The usage of the location is more likely to be covered by the Location Type.

      The use property "home | work | temp | old" does not cover the concept of billing addresses, or administrative postal address.

      Show
      The existing comment will be removed, as is not correct. And a new comment be included: "Additional addresses should be recorded another instance of the Location resource, or via the Organization" The usage of the location is more likely to be covered by the Location Type. The use property "home | work | temp | old" does not cover the concept of billing addresses, or administrative postal address.
    • Brian Postlethwaite/Line Saele:5-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive
    • STU3

      Location.address has a comment that says "This was kept as 0..1 as there is *no *use property on the address, so wouldn't be able to identify different address types"

      Since Address.use *does *exist, this comment seems incorrect.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Michelle Miller
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: