-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Priority:
Medium
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
STU3
-
FHIR Infrastructure
-
Definition Pattern
-
12.2.3
-
-
Richard Ettema/Grahame Grieve: 4-0-0
-
Correction
-
Non-substantive
-
STU3
Existing Wording: Unlike the request and event patterns, this pattern has not yet been formally reviewed, nor applied to any of its candidate resources. It should therefore be treated as a draft for comment. Alignment with this pattern (and the content of the pattern) will be discussed by work groups as part of ballot reconciliation.
Comment:
The pattern is flagged as Informative, but the text says Draft for Comment. These should be consistent, as should the maturity level
Summary:
Definition is informative or draft for comment?
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-3815 Negative - Julia Skapik : 2018-Jan-FHIR R1
- Balloted