Need appointment type for practitioner discussion - 2018-Jan Core #145

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Patient Administration
    • Appointment
    • Hide

      The binding for this valueset is preferred, so additional codes can be localised in jurisdictions or systems (or use other valuesets)

      Additional comments will be added to the appointmentType to state that for a provider to provider appointment the "FOLLOWUP" code may be appropriate, as this is expected to be discussing some patient that was seen in the past.

      Show
      The binding for this valueset is preferred, so additional codes can be localised in jurisdictions or systems (or use other valuesets) Additional comments will be added to the appointmentType to state that for a provider to provider appointment the "FOLLOWUP" code may be appropriate, as this is expected to be discussing some patient that was seen in the past.
    • Cooper Thompson/Andrew Torres:6-0-2
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive
    • STU3

      Comment:

      Appointment type current has values CHECKUP, EMERGENCY, FOLLOWUP, ROUTINE, WALKIN. There is no code listed which could be used when appointment is scheduled between 2 practitioners to discuss some case. There can be some code added for such appointment types.

      Summary:

      Need appointment type for practitioner discussion

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            divya_ahuja
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: