Change valuset binding for Naming System jurisdiction

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Terminology Infrastructure
    • Normative
    • Terminologies - Valuesets
    • Hide

      Will add the 3166-2 (subdivision) codes to the value set to cover this request.

      [Note that this addition now allows for two different ways to identify the US states].

      Also need to fix the Part 2 and 3 references in http://build.fhir.org/iso3166.html (currently they all show as Part 1).

      Make a note in the value set scope that this value set also includes codes for supra-national regions (http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49.htm).

      Show
      Will add the 3166-2 (subdivision) codes to the value set to cover this request. [Note that this addition now allows for two different ways to identify the US states] . Also need to fix the Part 2 and 3 references in http://build.fhir.org/iso3166.html (currently they all show as Part 1). Make a note in the value set scope that this value set also includes codes for supra-national regions ( http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49.htm ).
    • Grahame Grieve / Peter Jordan: 6-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Compatible, substantive
    • STU3

      Hi,

      As per detials listed in the zulip conversation here:https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/implementers/topic/ValueSet.20extensibility.20clarification,

      This is a request to change the NamigSystem.jurisdiction binding to the ISO code system for states/provinces/territories.

      Thanks,

      Joel

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Joel Francis
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: