Confusing text re: sequence referred to as variation - 2018-May Genomics #4

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • Genomics Reporting (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Genomics
    • (profiles) [deprecated]
    • 1.1.1
    • Hide

      Proposed wording: remove the phrase in ()

      Note that a sequence might still be relevant (and might still be referred to as a variation) even if it is unchanged from the reference.

      Show
      Proposed wording: remove the phrase in () Note that a sequence might still be relevant (and might still be referred to as a variation) even if it is unchanged from the reference.
    • Bret Heale/Clem McDonald: 18-0-0
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      Existing Wording: Note that a sequence might still be relevant (and might still be referred to as a variation) even if it is unchanged from the reference.

      Comment:

      Is a sequence ever referred to as a variation? This is very confusing and may be wrong.

      Summary:

      Confusing text re: sequence referred to as variation

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            clemmcdonald
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: