References have been replaced by canonicals. Shouldn?t canonicals be a special case within a Reference? This allows the use of contained resources and local references as well as direct references. - 2018-May Core STU #27

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • ActivityDefinition
    • 12.18
    • Hide

      Canonical specifications are now supported by the tooling:

      https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=16949&start=0

      Will ensure all usages of canonical with CDS and CQI resources specify the target types.

      Show
      Canonical specifications are now supported by the tooling: https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=16949&start=0 Will ensure all usages of canonical with CDS and CQI resources specify the target types.
    • Bryn Rhodes/Thomson Kuhn: 13-0-0
    • Compatible, substantive
    • STU3

      Existing Wording: Canonical

      Comment:

      References have been replaced by canonicals. Shouldn?t canonicals be a special case within a Reference? This allows the use of contained resources and local references as well as direct references.

      Summary:

      References have been replaced by canonicals. Shouldn?t canonicals be a special case within a Reference? This allows the use of contained resources and local references as well as direct references.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Bas van den Heuvel
            Bas van den Heuvel
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: