This defines the type of measure. A measure can have multiple groups. Why mandate that all of them have the same type? Shouldn?t this be a group attribute? - 2018-May Core STU #43

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Comment
    • Resolution: Considered for Future Use
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Quality Information
    • Measure
    • 14.11.3
    • Hide

      The scoring type controls so many aspects of measure representation that mixing them would introduce a significant amount of complexity without a clear benefit.

      Note that there is a possiblity this could apply in the future when ratio measures are more clearly worked out.

      Show
      The scoring type controls so many aspects of measure representation that mixing them would introduce a significant amount of complexity without a clear benefit. Note that there is a possiblity this could apply in the future when ratio measures are more clearly worked out.
    • Bryn Rhodes/Juliet Rubini: 16-0-0

      Existing Wording: scoring

      0..1

      CodeableConcept

      proportion | ratio | continuous-variable | cohort

      MeasureScoring (Extensible)

      Comment:

      This defines the type of measure. A measure can have multiple groups. Why mandate that all of them have the same type? Shouldn?t this be a group attribute?

      Summary:

      This defines the type of measure. A measure can have multiple groups. Why mandate that all of them have the same type? Shouldn?t this be a group attribute?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Bas van den Heuvel
            Bas van den Heuvel
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: