from descriptive to computable - 2018-May Genomics #75

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • Genomics Reporting (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Genomics
    • (profiles) [deprecated]
    • General Genomic Repo
    • Hide

      WGM Jan 2019: Persuasive With Mod

      Consensus: Remove Descriptive Genetic Finding. It was to support cytogenetics, and this profile was removed previously.

      see Tracker 19936 (Tue-Q1)

      Show
      WGM Jan 2019: Persuasive With Mod Consensus: Remove Descriptive Genetic Finding. It was to support cytogenetics, and this profile was removed previously. see Tracker 19936 (Tue-Q1)
    • Arthur / Bob F: 19-0-0
    • Correction
    • Non-compatible

      Existing Wording: Figure 5: Genetic Findings

      Comment:

      ?Figure 5: Genetic Findings? nicely presents the relations between the genotype, haplotype and variation concepts.

      The second ?line? of the diagram presents the fact that structured data can be derived from more ?descriptive?, possibly free text data. However, isn?t that a basic principle of standardization, that is, the structuring of data from unstructured formats? What is unique in genetics with regard to structuring data in general?

      As for cytogenetics, it?s separated from descriptive and computable findings, but in fact such data sets are probably subject to the same process of structuring, going from more descriptive to more computable ? so why separate out at this connceptual level of modeling?

      Summary:

      from descriptive to computable

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Amnon Shabo
            Amnon Shabo
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: