BirthSex may be more appropriately modelled under Observation - STU #194

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Patient Care
    • FamilyMemberHistory
    • 4.4.1.618
    • Hide

      FamilyMemberHistory is not describing the birthSex (or gender) of the patient, themselves, but rather the birthSex (or gender) of the family member. While Observation.focus does allow an observation with a family member focus, it is more commonly represented as an attribute of the family member.

      Show
      FamilyMemberHistory is not describing the birthSex (or gender) of the patient, themselves, but rather the birthSex (or gender) of the family member. While Observation.focus does allow an observation with a family member focus, it is more commonly represented as an attribute of the family member.
    • Thom/Tony: 9-0-0
    • Enhancement

      Existing Wording: This value set is used in the following places:

      Resource: FamilyMemberHistory.gender

      Proposed Wording: ----

      Comment:

      BirthSex may be more appropriately modelled under Observation, e.g. Observation of a newborn, as it is a clinical assessment

      Summary:

      BirthSex may be more appropriately modelled under Observation

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Ken Sinn
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: