• Item:operations-top-levelMoreItem:operations-workItem:greenhopper_issue...Item:operations-archiveItem:operations-attach...Item:operations-votesw...Item:operations-subtasksItem:devstatus-cta-listItem:operations-operat...Item:operations-deleteItem:operations-manual...
  • Published
  • AdminItem:operations-fieldsItem:operations-admin-...
  • Item:operations-restore
Item:jira.issue.tools ExportXMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • Genomics Reporting (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Genomics
    • (profiles) [deprecated]
    • 1.7
    • Hide

      Bob M. and Joel will work on the text.
      (Should also have a generalized short discussion about dangers of using nomenclature. Could include a specialized discussion on PGx nomenclature)

      Show
      Bob M. and Joel will work on the text. (Should also have a generalized short discussion about dangers of using nomenclature. Could include a specialized discussion on PGx nomenclature)
    • Bob M / Jamie J: 7-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive

      A general discussion of the tradeoffs involved in usage of nomenclature-level HLA data would be helpful.

      Topics could include the closed-world assumption involved in generating an allele call, the possible introduction of additional ambiguity when converting (or interpreting) primary data into nomenclature, possible interoperability advantages (and widespread established clinical and scientific usage) of nomenclature-level HLA data, and the utility of using nomenclature-level HLA data when comparing data obtained via different laboratory methods.

            Panel: location:atl.jira.view.issue.left.context

              Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              Joel Schneider
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Panel: location:atl.jira.view.issue.right.context