Supporting Human and Veterinary - CG #10

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • Genomics Reporting (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Genomics
    • (profiles) [deprecated]
    • IG Home Page and FHI
    • Hide

      WGM Jan 2019: Persuasive with Mod

      Consensus: change wording to "This guide covers all aspects of human genetic reporting, including:" and then remove the first bullet ("human and vet...")

      Show
      WGM Jan 2019: Persuasive with Mod Consensus: change wording to "This guide covers all aspects of human genetic reporting, including:" and then remove the first bullet ("human and vet...")
    • Patrick W / Clem M: 16-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Compatible, substantive

      Existing Wording: Human and veterinary as well as bacterial and viral specimens

      and

      It covers both human and veterinary medicine

      Comment:

      Supporting both Human and Veterinary, are there potential conflicts inherent to supporting both that will need to be identified within resources, e.g. species? From a practical implementation and certification process E.g.

      1. We ran into a case where a medication code used in vetrinary medicine was used in human system certification testing, which was inappropriate and not supported. Ultimately the Certification test data was changed.

      2. PDMP (Prescription drug monitoring program) data is not standard across states. In one state species was a required data element related to a human patient denied a narcotic medication becasue it was also written for their pet. Species is also pointless data in a human based system.

      (also http://hl7.org/fhir/R4/overview-clinical.html )

      Summary:

      Supporting Human and Veterinary

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            George Dixon
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: