-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Priority:
Medium
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
STU3
-
Financial Mgmt
-
Claim
-
13.6.6
-
-
Andy Stechishin/Kathleen Connor: 4-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
-
R5
The Claim.provider comments starts with "Typically this field would be 1..1". The cardinality is fixed at 1..1 so I'm confused what that comment means. Are there _atypical _situations where the cardinality wouldn't be 1..1? If yes then we need to change the cardinality and provide an example. If not then I would suggest removing or rewording that phrase.