Should terminology, population criteria, and libraries be sub-sections of the "eCQM Basics" section? So these would all be 2.x.

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • US Quality Measures (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Quality Information
    • ImplementationGuide [deprecated]
    • Hide

      Agree, will update text to reflect accurate section headings and sub-sections.

      Show
      Agree, will update text to reflect accurate section headings and sub-sections.
    • Rob Samples/Juliet Rubini: 21-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive

      Existing wording:

      Measure resource containing metadata (the rest of this section) and terminology (Section 3), a population criteria section (Section 5), and at least one Library resource containing a data criteria section (Section 4) as well as the logic used to define the population criteria.


      All related section headers

      *Proposed wording: *

      Measure resource containing metadata (Section 2.1) and terminology (Section 2.2), a population criteria section (Section 2.4), and at least one Library resource containing a data criteria section (Section 2.3) as well as the logic used to define the population criteria.


      All related section headers updated to align with changes listed above.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            lizzie_charbonneau
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: