NLM should review sections

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • US Quality Measures (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Quality Information
    • ImplementationGuide [deprecated]
    • Hide

      Agreed, get NLM review once changes for this round have been applied as part of a pre-publication review step to ensure content is aligned with NLM usage expectations for the FHIR VSAC API.

      Show
      Agreed, get NLM review once changes for this round have been applied as part of a pre-publication review step to ensure content is aligned with NLM usage expectations for the FHIR VSAC API.
    • Bryn Rhodes/Ben Hamlin: 16-0-0
    • Enhancement
    • Non-substantive

      Have you had someone from NLM review sections 2.4.1 and 2.4.2 (accessing value sets by version/profile)? There are nuances between these approaches which should be explained or referenced here. It would be good to get NLM's wording for these nuances.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            lizzie_charbonneau
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: