Existing Wording: The canonical representation of ELM makes it straightforward to derive data requirements for CQL data references to comply with Conformance Requirement 6:

(a) ELM elements with an xsi:type of Retrieve are equivalent to the DataRequirement type defined in FHIR

(b) The value of those ELM element's dataType attributes can be mapped to the type element for the DataRequirement

(c) The value of those ELM element's codes child elements identify the value set for the concept for that data reference

(d) The value of those ELM element's templateIdentifier attributes can be mapped to the profile element for the DataRequirement

(e) For each ELM element identified in item (a) above, an dataRequirement should be included using the profile identified in item (d) that references the value set identified in item (c)

Comment:

IMO, it is not clear what "Conformance Requirement 6" is. Is it defined by the five bullets below? (if so, I'd suggest to put it in a grey box like the rest). Or is it just missing?

Add-on: if the bullets are the requirement it should use the same nomenclature, e.g. SHALL SHOULD...

Summary:

Not clear what "Conformance Requirement 6" is.