Examples document is not helpful enough. IG needs more explanation.

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • US Da Vinci CDex (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Patient Care
    • STU
    • Profiles [deprecated]
    • Hide

      The examples will be revised to have better comments.  They will also be explicitly referenced from the formal spec, making it clear what parts of the spec - and points in the workflow - they're intended to represent

      Show
      The examples will be revised to have better comments.  They will also be explicitly referenced from the formal spec, making it clear what parts of the spec - and points in the workflow - they're intended to represent
    • Bob Dieterle / Laura Herrman : 13-0-2
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      When looking at the list of examples, there is no place to see where to go to get context about what this examples shows and how it fits into the IG explanation.

      The included examples show what we actually used to test this with CMS/Mettles

      I started added comments within the example for the Data Query. The examples in the IG should include clear comments and there needs to be pages a narrative that explain the samples and what they show....what elements to populate and what FHIR mechanisms are needed, i.e. conditional creates and conditional references, and when to use contained resources and why.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Lisa R. Nelson
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: