Diagnostic Report Prefered

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • US Breast Cancer Radiology Reporting (FHIR)
    • Clinical Interoperability Council
    • (many)
    • Questions
    • Hide

      a) As per Graham Grieve's recommendations, we intend to use Diagnostic Report as the root and Observations as the section headers. Based on feedback from the next ballot we may revisit this.

      b) The terminology in the current ballot were mostly placeholders, terminology will be revisited in the next ballot, including creating required LOINC/SNOMED/SOLOR codes as necessary.

      Show
      a) As per Graham Grieve's recommendations, we intend to use Diagnostic Report as the root and Observations as the section headers. Based on feedback from the next ballot we may revisit this. b) The terminology in the current ballot were mostly placeholders, terminology will be revisited in the next ballot, including creating required LOINC/SNOMED/SOLOR codes as necessary.
    • Enhancement
    • Compatible, substantive

      I beliee that the sections and sub-sections needed can be expressed using a combination of observations.

      I think DiagnosticReport is the appropriate 'top level parent' for the overall content.

      If changes are needed, they should be made to DiagnosticReport in stead of the 'hybridization' of DiagnosticReport and Composition being suggested in this ballot.

      DiagnosticReport should not be dropped. I think switching to composition will encourage the use of text instead of discreet values.

            Assignee:
            Richard R. Esmond
            Reporter:
            kathy_walsh
            kathy_walsh
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: