Suggest using CG's RegionStudied profile instead of extension

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Medium
    • US Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Interoperability Council
    • STU
    • Profiles
    • Hide

      Duplicate of GF#24480 as acknowledged by the submitter in the comment details.

      Changed to "in-person" with ClemM to resolve GForge validation issues. This was discussed in-person with him anyway.

      Show
      Duplicate of GF#24480 as acknowledged by the submitter in the comment details. Changed to "in-person" with ClemM to resolve GForge validation issues. This was discussed in-person with him anyway.
    • Richard Esmond/Kurt Allen: 10-0-1
    • Enhancement
    • Compatible, substantive

      Would strongly suggest the RegionStudied profile from the Clinical Genomics WG:http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/genomics-reporting/obs-region-studied.html It includes multiple ways to describe the region, coverage, and some other attributes. Using it would provide better interoperability and it is well-developed (but with one loose end).

            Assignee:
            May Terry
            Reporter:
            clemmcdonald
            clemmcdonald
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: