-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Priority:
Medium
-
Clinical Guidelines (FHIR)
-
STU3
-
Clinical Decision Support
-
Profile Definitions and Documentation
-
-
Chris Moesel/Rob Samples: 18-0-2
-
Enhancement
-
Non-substantive
Need to be clear when we are:
1) describing the patient and their clinicopathological process (may be termed a Case for a given patient on a pathway or a Case Definition across a population such as where guidelines are to be applied)
2) describing medical decision-making logic (clinical reasoning) for a general case (e.g. Plan Definition) and for a given instance/ patient (e.g. Care Plan)
3) describing actual clinician workflow processes and/or EHR information processing/ ui behavior (where the results of specific decisions get implemented in real-world care settings for actual patients)
Conflation of discriptions and logic for these distinct processes can cause significant and unnecessary complexity. It is a domain separation of concerns (vs technical stack) and occurs within the logic representation.
Dongwen Wang, Mor Peleg, Samson W Tu, Aziz A Boxwala, Robert A Greenes, Vimla L Patel, Edward H Shortliffe; Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines:: A literature review of guideline representation models, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Volume 68, Issues 1-3, 2002, Pages 59-70, ISSN 1386-5056.
Gooch P, Roudsari A. Computerization of workflows, guidelines, and care pathways: a review of implementation challenges for process-oriented health information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):738-48. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000033. Epub 2011 Jul 1. PMID: 21724740; PMCID: PMC3197986.
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-10293 Affirmative - Matthew Burton : 2019-Sep-FHIR IG CPG R1
- Closed