-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
-
Priority:
Medium
-
US Da Vinci PAS (FHIR)
-
STU3
-
Financial Mgmt
-
(profiles) [deprecated]
-
-
Robert Dieterle / Jeff Brown : 20-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Comment:
Sadly, this seems to imply that Claim items should be resources. Option 1: (preferred) Reference by sequence. Also (more specific to claim and claim response), why use sequence in an array. Arrays have natural orders. You could simply use those.
Option 2: Alternatively, allow item.identifier 0..*and remove item.sequence 1..1. The latter is not essential in an ordered list to provide "sequencing", and is described as "Necessary to provide a mechanism to link to items from within the claim and within the adjudication details of the ClaimResponse." Since you don't find it sufficient, and do find it necessary to include any number of identifiers, this seems to incdicate that claim itself is broken.
Summary:
Sadly, this seems to imply that Claim items should be resources.
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-10818 Negative - Keith W. Boone : 2019-Sep-FHIR IG PAS R1
- Balloted