-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Priority:
Medium
-
US Da Vinci PAS (FHIR)
-
STU3
-
Financial Mgmt
-
(profiles) [deprecated]
-
HIPAA
-
-
Robert Dieterle / Rachael Foerster: 20-0-1
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Existing Wording: No existing wording related to applicable HIPAA Privacy Rules, especially wrt to minimum necessary determinations, and enforcement of patient consent, in particular when a patient pays for services out of pocket in full and dissents from disclosure to payers.
Proposed Wording: HIPAA Privacy Rule Considerations:
Disclosing providers and requesting payers must ensure that the Resources included in PAS Bundle meet HIPAA Minimum Necessary provisions at 45 CFR Section 164.502(b) and 164.514(d).
Also see HIPAA FAQs for Professionals - Minimum Necessary https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/faq/minimum-necessary/index.html. In particular, see:
Doesn't the HIPAA Privacy Rule minimum necessary standard conflict with the HIPAA transaction standards? https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/faq/212/does-minimum-necessary-standard-conflict-with-hipaa-transaction-standards/index.html
Is a covered entity required to apply the HIPAA Privacy Rule's minimum necessary standard to a disclosure of protected health information it makes to another covered entity? https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/faq/216/does-minimum-necessary-standard-apply-to-disclosures/index.html
Disclosing providers and requesting payers must ensure that the Resources included in PAS Bundle does not pertain to an individual other than the patient except where deemed minimum necessary for purposes of payment. For example, family history may not be pertinent while records about a mother's newborn may be..
The following is an excerpt from 45 CFR § 164.501: Payment means:
(1) The activities undertaken by:
(ii) A health care provider or health plan to obtain or provide reimbursement for the provision of health care; and
(2) The activities in paragraph (1) of this definition relate to the individual to whom health care is provided
Comment:
The HIPAA section should include pertinent citations to the HIPAA Privacy Rule on minimum necessary and the limitations on information which may be requested for payment purposes. The HIPAA Section should make clear that the onus of determining minimum necessary for payment purposes is on the payer, not the provider. Providers may reasonably rely that a requesting covered entity has limited that request to the minimum necessary to accomplish a permissible purpose. That said, providers are not required to disclose more than what their own policy stipulates as the minimum necessary.
While not stated in this section, elsewhere in DaVinci, specifically CRD Considerations, the onus of determining minimum necessary is put on the provider: https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/davinci-crd/usecases.html, "The EMR would determine in which situations a payer system would be contacted for CRD purposes and what level of information the payer would be permitted to receive - including through the payer query mechanism. The determination of what information is shared could be influenced by patient consent and other internal business rules."
Summary:
The onus for determining the minimum necessary for HIPAA payment falls on payers
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-10821 Negative - Kenneth Rubin : 2019-Sep-FHIR IG PAS R1
- Balloted