Personas vs Patient - CPG #120

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • Clinical Guidelines (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • (NA)
    • Documentation
    • Hide

      Will work with HTA to ensure we are referencing the external classification correctly.

      In addition, we will specify personas using the existing FHIR representation for those as currently specified by Patient, Practitioner, PractitionerRole, and RelatedPerson, and make clear that the personas code system is an example.

      Show
      Will work with HTA to ensure we are referencing the external classification correctly. In addition, we will specify personas using the existing FHIR representation for those as currently specified by Patient, Practitioner, PractitionerRole, and RelatedPerson, and make clear that the personas code system is an example.
    • Clarification
    • Compatible, substantive

      Existing Wording: Personas

      The personas identified in this implementation guide are defined based on the WHO recommendation for Classifying health workers.

      Comment:

      Structuring Recommendations: Please explain why existing FHIR constructs, including Patient, PractitionerRole, and the practice-codes value set are not specified. Is the community really ready to adopt this orthoganal approach?

      Summary:

      Personas vs Patient

            Assignee:
            Reuben Daniels
            Reporter:
            Thomson Kuhn
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: