Using CRD and even DTR to trigger prior auth is a fundamentally flawed workflow which requires clinician work. - PAS #128

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • US Da Vinci PAS (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Financial Mgmt
    • (profiles) [deprecated]
    • Hide

      Any EHR implementation of the CRD, DTR and/or PAS may improve or negatively impact the provider workflow.  The IGs only define the trigger and exchange process and do not specify a specific clinical workflow.  The process could be implemented in the providers clinical workflow or in the workflow of a front/back office.  Prior Authorization (PA) workflows have always involved provider and front/back office workflow.  Our objective is to clarify and streamline the overall PA process.

      Show
      Any EHR implementation of the CRD, DTR and/or PAS may improve or negatively impact the provider workflow.  The IGs only define the trigger and exchange process and do not specify a specific clinical workflow.  The process could be implemented in the providers clinical workflow or in the workflow of a front/back office.  Prior Authorization (PA) workflows have always involved provider and front/back office workflow.  Our objective is to clarify and streamline the overall PA process.
    • Bob Dieterle/Celine Lefebvre: 19-0-1

      Comment:

      Using CRD and even DTR to trigger prior auth is a fundamentally flawed workflow which requires clinician work.

      Summary:

      Using CRD and even DTR to trigger prior auth is a fundamentally flawed workflow which requires clinician work.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Isaac Vetter
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: