-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Priority:
Medium
-
US Da Vinci PAS (FHIR)
-
STU3
-
Financial Mgmt
-
(profiles) [deprecated]
-
Use Cases and Overvi
-
-
Robert Dieterle / Rachael Foerster: 20-0-1
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Existing Wording: Is Prior Authorization Necessary?
Proposed Wording: Is Prior Authorization Required?
Comment:
The term "necessary" holds a different context when discussing PA, which largely hinges on a determination of medical "necessity". Recommend changing to "required", which more accurately conveys the payer rules
Summary:
"Necessary" holds a clinical context when discussing prior authorization. Recommend replacing with "required".
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-10973 Affirmative - Terrence Cunningham : 2019-Sep-FHIR IG PAS R1
- Closed