Is annotation of the finding of a variant needed in a minimal data set? - MCODE #30

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Question
    • Resolution: Considered - Question answered
    • Priority: Medium
    • US Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Interoperability Council
    • (many)
    • Hide

      Based on the example provided on what is annotating the finding of a variant (e.g.: the interpretation of the presence of a variant with respect to Tumor treatment outcome), then yes, it is needed in a minimal data set.

      Proposed resolution: Considered - Question Answered.

      Show
      Based on the example provided on what is annotating the finding of a variant (e.g.: the interpretation of the presence of a variant with respect to Tumor treatment outcome), then yes, it is needed in a minimal data set. Proposed resolution: Considered - Question Answered.
    • Richard Esmond/Kurt Allen: 10-0-1

      Comment:

      Comment only. I leave it to the oncologists consulted in this project as to weather or not the annotation associated with the finding of a variant (e.g. interpretation of the presence of a variant with respect to Tumor treatment outcome) is needed in the MINIMAL data set. The current offering of discrete variant results is sufficient, if one considers use of the variant data by recipient applications to reprobe algorithms or knowledge bases for annotations. Would consider mentioning why the absence of genetic-annotation information in the Profile description.

      Summary:

      Is annotation of the finding of a variant needed in a minimal data set?

            Assignee:
            May Terry
            Reporter:
            bheale
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: