-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Considered - No action required
-
Priority:
Medium
-
US Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) (FHIR)
-
STU3
-
Clinical Interoperability Council
-
(NA)
-
Landing Page - Discl
-
-
MayTerry/Richard Esmond: 14-0-0
-
Clarification
Existing Wording: "The authors are considering whether it might be more accurate to represent Clinical and Pathologic Staging Groups as DiagnosticReports, rather than Observations. Feedback is welcome."
Comment:
While we recognize that the DiagnosticReports modeling might be the more technically accurate representation, we feel Staging is best represented as Observations rather than DiagnosticReports for the initial implementation.
-The observation model aligns with the HL7 CDA® R2 IG: Reporting to Public Health Cancer Registries from Ambulatory Healthcare Providers, R1, DSTU Release 1.1 - US Realm that is already used by vendors transmitting cancer reports to state cancer registries.
-The Observations model can be incorporated into the DiagnosticReports Model without much revision.
-The DiagnosticReports Model is more complex/heavy
Summary:
Modeling Clinical and Pathologic Staging Groups as Observations
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-10689 Affirmative - Nedra Garrett : 2019-Sep-FHIR IG MCODE R1
- Closed