Performance scales beyond ECOG and KPS - MCODE #136

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Question
    • Resolution: Considered - No action required
    • Priority: Medium
    • US Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE) (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Interoperability Council
    • (NA)
    • Landing page - Model
    • Hide

      The only performance status instruments in scope for mCODE 0.9.1 were only KPS and ECOG, determined by the mCODE executive committee.

      Additional performance status instruments will be considered pending use cases and agreement by the mCODE executive committee.

      Proposed resolution: Considered - No action required.

      Show
      The only performance status instruments in scope for mCODE 0.9.1 were only KPS and ECOG, determined by the mCODE executive committee. Additional performance status instruments will be considered pending use cases and agreement by the mCODE executive committee. Proposed resolution: Considered - No action required.
    • MayTerry/Richard Esmond: 14-0-0

      Comment:

      [Scope and Conceptual Model; Patient Group] Is the patient performance status limited to ECOG and KPS? Are other performance scales also allowed?

      Existing wording: Patient performance status - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status and/or Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS).

      Proposed wording: Patient performance status -for example Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status and/or Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS).

      Summary:

      Performance scales beyond ECOG and KPS

            Assignee:
            May Terry
            Reporter:
            Zabrina Gonzaga
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: