Please define CertificationType in PCDE context if needed. - PCDE #72

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Comment
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • US Da Vinci PCDE (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Financial Mgmt
    • (profiles) [deprecated]
    • Hide

      The binding for CertificationType (and for many of the other elements in PAS) are implicitly X12. We're not yet at the point where we can point to those explicitly (even just by name). We don't see a need to constrain the use of this (or any other) PAS elements in PCDE.

      Show
      The binding for CertificationType (and for many of the other elements in PAS) are implicitly X12. We're not yet at the point where we can point to those explicitly (even just by name). We don't see a need to constrain the use of this (or any other) PAS elements in PCDE.
    • Kathleen Connor / Rachael Foerster: 20-0-1

      Comment:

      CertificationType is an extension in prior autho but it is not clear whether this is relevant to PCDE and if so, what value sets or responses should be allowed/constrained. Please define this field in PCDE context if needed.

      Summary:

      Please define CertificationType in PCDE context if needed.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            jskapik
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: