Does this IG aim to exchange information beyond the USCDI V1.0? - PCDE #133

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • US Da Vinci PCDE (FHIR)
    • Financial Mgmt
    • (profiles) [deprecated]
    • 2.2
    • Hide

      The goal is to share sufficient information to allow continuation of treatment.  This may be more than or less than that defined in USCDI.  

      The guide will indicate that Payers must still adhere to all applicable federal and state rules, including HIPAA "minimum necessary" requirements.

      Show
      The goal is to share sufficient information to allow continuation of treatment.  This may be more than or less than that defined in USCDI.   The guide will indicate that Payers must still adhere to all applicable federal and state rules, including HIPAA "minimum necessary" requirements.
    • Mark Scrimshire / Mary Kay McDaniel: 17-0-2
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      Existing Wording: The goal is to provide for continuity of care and to minimize provider burden. While the CMS NPRM points to the ability to exchange clinical data that is, at a minimum, defined by USCDI V1.0…

      Comment:

      The CMS rule requires payers to exchange the full USCDI at a minimum upon the beneficiary's request. Does this IG aim to exchange information beyond the USCDI V1.0? We have concerns about whether excessive data access will lead to increased prior authorization and patient profiling—limiting coverage and access to care. Appropriate details and relevant safeguards against misuse should be included.

      Summary:

      Does this IG aim to exchange information beyond the USCDI V1.0?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Terrence Cunningham
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: