-
Type:
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Priority:
Medium
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
STU3
-
Terminology Infrastructure
-
ConceptMap
-
-
Carmela Couderc/Reuben Daniels : 3-0-0
-
Correction
-
Non-substantive
During the 10/3/2019 Vocab FHIR Tracker call it was noticed that at least the two administrative gender concept map examples are not correct.
Note: the definition of how to value relationship type code is under consideration and will be resolved with tracker 16364. Even if the definition stays as is documented in the current build of 10/3/2019, the relationship type code is incorrect in at least some of the examples. See tracker 24899.
This ticket acknowledges the task to review. The review cannot be completed until 16364 is resolved.
1. General concept map example (address use)
2. SNOMED CT / ICD-10 mapping example
3. Specimen Type v2 -> SNOMED CT Mapping
4. Additional ConceptMap Example
5. CDS Hooks Indicator mapping to Request Priority
- relates to
-
FHIR-29947 ConceptMap Examples Relationship Code Rendering is Confusing
-
- Triaged
-
-
FHIR-31515 Examples are required to describe and demonstrate the correct use of the dependsOn and product data elements in the ConceptMap resource and $translate operation
-
- Triaged
-