Future Potencial Scenarios to be ballotted?

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Highest
    • US Da Vinci Alerts (FHIR)
    • 0.2.0 [deprecated]
    • Infrastructure & Messaging
    • Home (index)
    • 1.1.2.1
    • Hide

      There is no plan to publish additional use cases in this implementation guide, It is expected that Additional Scenarios/IUse Cases will be published as:

      add to introduction about future use cases stating...

      1) supplemental non- ballotted informative documents like the CCDA examples task-force has created: http://cdasearch.hl7.org/
      2) Use Case specific implementation Guides published by other entities inside or outside of HL7.

      Show
      There is no plan to publish additional use cases in this implementation guide, It is expected that Additional Scenarios/IUse Cases will be published as: add to introduction about future use cases stating... 1) supplemental non- ballotted informative documents like the CCDA examples task-force has created: http://cdasearch.hl7.org/ 2) Use Case specific implementation Guides published by other entities inside or outside of HL7.
    • Craig Newman/Paul Knapp: 3-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      We would like to make sure that all future potencial will be ballotted out? If this IG passes, that does not mean that these scenarios are part of the broader IG?

      Existing Wording:

      Future Potencial Scenarios

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Celine Lefebvre
            Celine Lefebvre
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: