Invariant rules section unclear without more context.

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • Shorthand (FHIR)
    • 0.12.0 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Language Reference
    • 1.3
    • Hide

      Section 1.3 doesn't look bad, but in the language reference, the Invariant section (3.4.10) is too short and lacking adequate explanation. We will add a table to show how invariants are constructed, and an example.

      Show
      Section 1.3 doesn't look bad, but in the language reference, the Invariant section (3.4.10) is too short and lacking adequate explanation. We will add a table to show how invariants are constructed, and an example.
    • Moesel/Rhodes 11-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      The invariant section is unclear and requires further explanation on how it works, e.g. by including the Invariant definition.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Bas van den Heuvel
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: