Unclarified need for two examples

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Medium
    • Shorthand (FHIR)
    • 0.12.0 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Language Reference
    • 1.3.4
    • Hide

      Not part of the formal specification, but still a good suggestion. It will be rewritten as:

       
      "Here are two examples of defining inline extensions, the first with a single extension, the second with multiple extensions:"

      Show
      Not part of the formal specification, but still a good suggestion. It will be rewritten as:   "Here are two examples of defining inline extensions, the first with a single extension, the second with multiple extensions:"
    • Moesel/Rhodes 11-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      Please clarify in the text why two examples are needed and one is not enough. I do not see any significant sintactic differences between them.

      Existing Wording:

      Here are two examples of defining inline extensions: …

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            ivan_zapreev
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: