Missing clarification of the example

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • Shorthand (FHIR)
    • 0.12.0 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Language Reference
    • 1.3.4
    • Hide

      While this comment refers to non-normative content, the same issue applies to the formal spec. We will clear in both places that lower case and capitalized names are merely conventions, not part of the specification.

      Show
      While this comment refers to non-normative content, the same issue applies to the formal spec. We will clear in both places that lower case and capitalized names are merely conventions, not part of the specification.
    • Moesel/Rhodes 11-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      The provided text indicates that a standalone as well as the local names are used. However, it is not immediately obvious from the provided example:
      1. The external name is alized
      2. The local name is low-case

      I think it would have if perhaps the names in the example code would be somehow emphasized. Or a sentence is added that indicates that, for example the alized name of the external extention "USCoreRace" is mapped to the local name "race"

      Existing Wording:

      With standalone extensions, the main difference is that the grammar includes both the standalone name and the assigned local name: …

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            ivan_zapreev
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: