Clarification or simplification is needed

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Medium
    • Shorthand (FHIR)
    • 0.12.0 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Language Reference
    • 1.4
    • Hide

      The wording comes directly from FHIR, and it isn't very clear there. Rather than trying to define what constitutes a good FHIR name in the FSH specification, we propose to add a link to where this is discussed in FHIR, namely, http://www.hl7.org/fhir/structuredefinition.html#resource.

      Show
      The wording comes directly from FHIR, and it isn't very clear there. Rather than trying to define what constitutes a good FHIR name in the FSH specification, we propose to add a link to where this is discussed in FHIR, namely, http://www.hl7.org/fhir/structuredefinition.html#resource .
    • Moesel/Rhodes 11-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      Both "computer-ready" and "suitable for code generation" are not well defined terms. Please consider referencing the exact requirements or consider removing this as this comment is not sufficiently clarifying.

      Existing Wording:

      The name is typically title case and should be “computer-ready” (i.e., suitable for code generation).

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            ivan_zapreev
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: