A non-informative statement

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Low
    • Shorthand (FHIR)
    • 0.12.0 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Language Reference
    • 1.5
    • Hide

      "Minimum viable product" is too jargon-ish. What the passage tries to express is that while FSH and SUSHI can produce real, useful IGs, there is still more that could be done. We'll express that without the unnecessary jargon.

      Show
      "Minimum viable product" is too jargon-ish. What the passage tries to express is that while FSH and SUSHI can produce real, useful IGs, there is still more that could be done. We'll express that without the unnecessary jargon.
    • Kramer/Rhodes: 14-0-0
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      The current formulation has two flaws:
      1. "minimum viable product" is not well defined
      2. It is not clear how much more do FSH and SUSHI provide compared to the "minimum viable product"

      So as-it-is-now the sentence conveys minimum amount of information. I would suggest to first define what would be a "minimum viable product" and then enumberate what was done on top of that. Alternatively, consider substituting this sentence with enumerating the key features and capabilities of FSH and SUSHI that make it clear that the provided tools can be put to a good use.

      Existing Wording:

      Version 1.0 of FSH and SUSHI are capable of producing sophisticated IGs and offer more than a “minimum viable product”.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            ivan_zapreev
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: