Nexted mixins?

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: High
    • Shorthand (FHIR)
    • 0.12.0 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Language Reference
    • Hide

      Based on other comments, mixins have been replace with "insert" rules that can do what mixins do, but better. Having a ruleset within a ruleset is allowed provided there is no circularity.

      Show
      Based on other comments, mixins have been replace with "insert" rules that can do what mixins do, but better. Having a ruleset within a ruleset is allowed provided there is no circularity.
    • Moesel/Rhodes 11-0-1
    • Enhancement
    • Compatible, substantive

      The grammar makes clear that rulesets cannot reference mixins. Consider calling this out in this section

      Existing Wording:

      Nested mixins?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Bryn Rhodes
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: