Consider removing reference to FSH Food if it will not be actively maintained.

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Low
    • Shorthand (FHIR)
    • 0.12.0 [deprecated]
    • FHIR Infrastructure
    • Overview
    • 1.1.2 Related Tools
    • Hide

      The reference isn't in the normative part of the spec, so mentioning FSH Food as a project is perfectly fine. I moved it to the "Futures" section under "Round Tripping" because it really isn't ready.

      Show
      The reference isn't in the normative part of the spec, so mentioning FSH Food as a project is perfectly fine. I moved it to the "Futures" section under "Round Tripping" because it really isn't ready.
    • Kramer/Rhodes: 14-0-0
    • Correction
    • Non-substantive
    • Yes

      It's unclear to me if FSH Food will continue to evolve. Unless we have confidence that people are working on it, we should consider removing it from the content.

      Existing Wording:

      There is also a tool, FSH Food, that converts profiles and extensions (StructureDefinitions) into FSH… these tools are expected to continue to evolve and change during and after the ballot.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            cmoesel
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: