Figure acronyms are somewhat confusing due to inconsistence with previous two pages

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Highest
    • US FHIR Guidance - Quality Reporting (FHIR)
    • 0.1 [deprecated]
    • Clinical Quality Information
    • Home
    • Background
    • Hide

      All diagrams have been updated to use consistent acronyms throughout the paper with Figure numbers and captions. Items such as IPS (International Patient Summary) are now identified and defined with reference to the relevance in the descriptions that reference the figures.

      See version 1.8 of the document: https://confluence.hl7.org/download/attachments/35718345/The%20Case%20for%20FHIR-based%20Quality%20Measurement%20v1.8_CQI_17Aug2020.docx?api=v2. 

      Show
      All diagrams have been updated to use consistent acronyms throughout the paper with Figure numbers and captions. Items such as IPS (International Patient Summary) are now identified and defined with reference to the relevance in the descriptions that reference the figures. See version 1.8 of the document: https://confluence.hl7.org/download/attachments/35718345/The%20Case%20for%20FHIR-based%20Quality%20Measurement%20v1.8_CQI_17Aug2020.docx?api=v2.  
    • Rob Samples/Floyd Eisenberg: 19-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      Figure acronyms are somewhat confusing due to inconsistence with previous two pages - What is IPS? Why "Reasoning" istead of "Clinical Reasoning" or "CR"? Why "XYZ-ON-FHIR" instead of "XYZ"? | Suggest to (1) review the terms under the boxes to be the same as used before (2) somewhere, explain what IPS means and what it is.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Javier Espina
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: