Unclear placement of projects on the figure

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Highest
    • US FHIR Guidance - Quality Reporting (FHIR)
    • 0.1 [deprecated]
    • Clinical Quality Information
    • Home
    • Background
    • Hide

      Thank you for this comment. All Figures have been updated with consistent acronyms and captions including Figure numbers. The subsequent text explaining Figure 4 (the one reference in this comment) clarifies how the different artifacts related to each other. The diagram also includes new arrows to more effectively show the relationships.

      See version 1.8 of the document: https://confluence.hl7.org/download/attachments/35718345/The%20Case%20for%20FHIR-based%20Quality%20Measurement%20v1.8_CQI_17Aug2020.docx?api=v2. 

      Show
      Thank you for this comment. All Figures have been updated with consistent acronyms and captions including Figure numbers. The subsequent text explaining Figure 4 (the one reference in this comment) clarifies how the different artifacts related to each other. The diagram also includes new arrows to more effectively show the relationships. See version 1.8 of the document: https://confluence.hl7.org/download/attachments/35718345/The%20Case%20for%20FHIR-based%20Quality%20Measurement%20v1.8_CQI_17Aug2020.docx?api=v2.  
    • Rob Samples/Floyd Eisenberg: 19-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      Either on the figure itself, be means of arrows, or in text. One is to explain the placement of the "project". It seems like their position carries information, but it is not 100% clear. For example, EBM seems to facilitate interactions between 1. and 2. DEQM is facilitation interactions between 5. and 6. However, it is not clear from the Figure if CDS Hooks is something specific for 3. or 4. or for some interactions? Also, is QM IG something related to 5.? What about CQL, QI Core, and CR. They say that a picture is worth a thousand words. Yet, the picture is to be clear for understanding. In the form it is now it is not very clear.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            ivan_zapreev
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: