An example of more explanation would be needed.

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Priority: Highest
    • US FHIR Guidance - Quality Reporting (FHIR)
    • 0.1 [deprecated]
    • Clinical Quality Information
    • Home
    • Expressivity
    • Hide

      The issue seems to come from the existing phrase, "but also the relationships between those data elements such as the performers of an Encounter or Procedure" - this should read "the performance of an Encounter or Procedure" since that is the issue that requires timing if there is no direct relationship - not the performer.

      Show
      The issue seems to come from the existing phrase, "but also the relationships between those data elements such as the performers of an Encounter or Procedure" - this should read "the  performance of an Encounter or Procedure" since that is the issue that requires timing if there is no direct relationship - not the performer.
    • Floyd Eisenberg/Ben Hamlin: 23-2-0
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      • What is a timing relationship?
      • Why using timing relationship is not good?
      • May be an example could help?

      Existing Wording:

      These relationships are a critical aspect of establishing relevant criteria in a quality measure, but have traditionally been expressed using timing relationships between the data elements, rather than direct references expressed in the information model.

      Proposed Wording:

      ?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            ivan_zapreev
            Javier Espina
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: