Undefined context

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Priority: Highest
    • US FHIR Guidance - Quality Reporting (FHIR)
    • 0.1 [deprecated]
    • Clinical Quality Information
    • Home
    • Aignment
    • Hide

      Agree, language will be adjust to the following for clarity.  

       

      In addition, alignment reduces the need for transformation logic, which leads to more fidelity in the exchanged data and higher quality data available for use in all aspects of healthcare, including quality measurement.

      Show
      Agree, language will be adjust to the following for clarity.     In addition, alignment reduces the need for transformation logic, which leads to more fidelity in the exchanged data and higher quality data available for use in all aspects of healthcare, including quality measurement.
    • Rob Samples/Floyd Eisenberg: 19-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

      Please explain in which cases one needs to provide this transformation logic. So it sounds like if all is done with FHIR then it is already aligned with the existing clinical systems. Do you then oppose this to non FHIR implementations that may not be aligned and thus would need an additional data transforming adapter layer? This is a bit arguable then, as other solutions may also be aligned with the existing clinical information systems. So Probably here you mean that because of this existing alignment of FHIR if one uses FHIR then there is no need to writing transformation logic?

      Existing Wording:

      The less transformation logic has to be written

      Proposed Wording:

      ?

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            ivan_zapreev
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: